• 
  • Chancellor
  • Academic Affairs
  • Administration and Finance
  • Advancement
  • Communications
  • Councils & Workgroups
  • Internal Audit
  • Government Relations
  • Procurement
  • Legislative Testimony
  • Employment
  • Directions to the USM System Office
  • System Office Staff Directory
  • Organizational Chart
  • Organizational Chart of Institutions
• 
  • Universities
  • Research Institutions
  • Online Application
  • Transcripts
  • Systemwide Staff Directory
  • USM Institutions Map
• 
  • Members
  • Committees
  • Schedule of Meetings
  • Agendas
  • Minutes
  • Bylaws and Policies
  • Effectiveness & Efficiency Initiative
  • Honorary Degrees
  • Advisory Councils
  • Resolutions
• 
  • Bylaws
  • System Policies
  • I. Systemwide Councils and Institutional Boards
  • II. Faculty
  • III. Academic Affairs
  • IV. Research
  • V. Student Affairs
  • VI. General Administration
  • VII. Human Resources
  • VIII. Fiscal and Business Affairs
  • IX. External Relations
  • X. Information Technology
• 
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Office of Human Resources
  • Human Resources Policies
• 
  • Search for:

      VII-5.00- POLICY ON PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHANCELLOR AND THE INSTITUTION 
  
PRESIDENTS/CENTER DIRECTORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SYSTEM
 
 
  (Approved by the Board of Regents, April 26, 1990)
 
 
        The Board of Regents shall evaluate annually the
  performance of the Chancellor as Chief Executive Officer of the
  System and Chief of Staff of the Board of Regents.  The Board
  shall designate a select Committee to conduct such an evaluation,
 
  to discuss the results of that evaluation with the Chancellor,
  and to report the evaluation to the full Board.
 
        The Chancellor shall evaluate the performance of each
  constituent institution President and center Director (chief
  executive officer) annually, and discuss with the designated
  select committee of the Board of Regents the results of that
  evaluation and consequent recommendations for compensation
  actions.
 
        No less than every five years, the select committee shall
  conduct a comprehensive strategic reassessment of the leadership
  and resources of the System, using such technical assistance
  and external consultants as may be desirable to develop and
  administer the procedures required for a broad, detailed, and
  independent review.  The results of the strategic reassessment
  shall be reported to the full Board.